Amd Phenom Ii X4 940 Black Edition Deneb Reviews
Last month we gave caution a kicking and proclaimed AMD's return from the dead. Our first taste of AMD's new 45nm CPU architecture came with Opteron server sauce and it went down pretty well. Now AMD has served up the main desktop 45nm course in the form of the new Phenom II X4 quad-core chip.
Buy AMD HDZ940XCGIBOX Phenom II X4 940 Black Edition 3.0GHz Cache 8MB AM2+ 125W Processor - Retail: CPU Processors - Amazon.com FREE DELIVERY possible on eligible. AMD releases its 45nm desktop quad core CPU, the Phenom II. It's not as fast as Intel's fastest, but that. Feb 03, 2018 Page 1 AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition. Phenom II X4 810 and Phenom II X3 720 Black Edition as well as the Phenom II X4 940. Trusted Reviews is part. AMD Phenom II X4 980 Black Edition Review. Converse 220 User Manual. The Phenom II X4 980 Black Edition release marks a speed bump and a price drop for the. AMD Phenom II X4 980 BE: 3.7GHz.
Without giving away too much too soon, let's just say it's good enough to guarantee that the one thing we won't be eating is our own words. Meet Deneb Allow us, therefore, to introduce Deneb, as AMD's new quad-core 45nm desktop processor is codenamed. The story behind it is very simple. It's all about the silicon. 45nm silicon, that is, because architecturally speaking the Phenom II processor is largely the same old CPU design we've seen since the Athlon 64 appeared in 2003. Yup, that's absolutely aeons ago in CPU years. Tellingly, Intel has been through several radically different CPU architectures in that time, the latest of course being the ineffably awesome Core i7.
The funny thing is, though, the basic architecture of AMD's CPUs hasn't actually been the main problem holding it back. It's been the silicon. Right from the get go, AMD's existing 65nm silicon production node has been a significantly limiting factor.
Processor problems Wind your mind back to the end of 2006 and you'll recall the first 65nm Athlon X2 dual-core processors actually ran slower than the previous 90nm generation. We quizzed AMD at the time and it returned a nonchalant response, pretending it was normal for the first chips on a new node to run at modest clockspeeds. Wait and see, we were told, the 65nm silicon will scale very nicely in the long run. It never happened. Making matters worse, AMD's processor architects then did a pretty good job of hosing any chance the original Phenom had of being competitive by garnishing it with minor bugs and faults. For starters, there was the well publicised TLB bug that blighted early Phenoms, requiring a BIOS workaround that cost the sort of performance these struggling chips simply couldn't afford to give up.
Disappointing speeds However, more damaging in the long run were the speed path issues that have held back all Phenom processors. In simple terms, speed path problems involve isolated areas of circuitry that stubbornly refuse to maintain stability at high clockspeeds. Together, the troubled 65nm production process and Phenom design problems have meant that through the end of 2008, the best AMD could do was a rather hot and bothered 2.6GHz quad-core CPU. All the while Intel breached 3GHz with ease – and with an architecture that did significantly more work per clock, to boot. Crack Elite Dangerous here. Never go back But that was then. The now for AMD is looking a whole lot better.
For starters, the top chip in the new Phenom X4 range, the 940 Black Edition, runs at 3GHz on the nose, well above the maximum speed of the 65nm generation of quad-core processors. Indeed, so bullish was AMD about its new 45nm process, it flew us out to the US late last year to demonstrate chips running as fast as 6GHz with the aid of exotic cooling measures. Game Dragon Ball Z Supersonic Warriors 2 Gba. Crucially, therefore, the 45nm node is healthy.